At the Cato Institute, attorney Philip K. Howard proposes that we “radically simplify law.” He states:
Following up on yesterday's piece on the future of the legal industry, the American Thinker takes a look at the future of legal education.
Legal Futures features excerpts and analysis of a report by Jomati Consultants stating, among other things, that advances in artificial intelligence will lead to the demise of many law firms and a complete revolutionization of the legal industry: "Civilisation 2030: The Near Future for Law Firms."
At Above the Law, a look at the manner in which different types of law firms purchase websites and web development services, and the utility of doing so.
Plaintiffs in business disputes often attempt to make a case for the imminent danger of irreparable harm (a required element for ordering expedited proceedings and for many types of equitable relief, such as entitlement to a temporary restraining order (TRO) or preliminary injunction). Courts have developed numerous guidelines to determine whether a prima facie case for imminent danger of irreparable harm has been made. Perhaps one of the most common bases for claiming imminent danger is a claim that the defendant is fiscally insolvent and will be unable to pay its debts or other
At PJ Media, Bill Whittle, Professor Glenn Reynolds, Dave Swindle & Scott Ott discuss the legal and social implications: Robotic Sex Slaves: Will AI Robots Have Consciousness, Rights, Souls?